Circular construction

Photo by EJ Yao on Unsplash

Circular construction

Introduction

It is estimated that the global population will grow by 22% to 9.7 billion by 2050, and, with the current consumption pattern, it’s not hard to imagine the environmental burden and material shortage to which the urban infrastructure needed to meet this growth will lead to.

Currently, cities are home to 55% of the global population. Yet, they consume more than 75% of natural resources, produce more than 50% of all global waste, and contribute 60-80% to greenhouse gas emissions globally[1].

According to the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, most buildings are currently constructed according to a linear concept, and only 20% to 30% of construction and demolition waste (C&DW) is recycled or reused. According to Eurostat Waste statistics, in the EU, inert C&DW accounted for 37.1% of all waste generated in 2020, thereby becoming the largest waste stream in Europe. In 2020, in Poland, C&DW share in total waste generated was around 13% and in Iceland – around 50%. Currently, it is mainly used as backfilling and landscaping material, which, in many cases, should be classified as downcycling, i.e., a significant reduction in the quality and functionality of the material concerning its original values.

At the same time, more than half (55%) of global industrial carbon emissions come from the production of just five materials: steel (25%), cement (19%), paper (4%), plastic, and aluminium (3%). The construction industry is not only the primary consumer of cement but also consumes about 26% of aluminium, 50% of steel, and 25% of plastic[2].

Moreover, following the United Nations Environment Programme report[3], natural resource extraction and processing (so including raw materials extractions and processing for construction purposes) accounts for more than 90% of global biodiversity loss and water stress.

Mitigating the toll on the environment taken by the construction sector demands transforming the sector into a more circular one, thereby preserving the value of construction materials and keeping them on the market as long as possible.

Circular construction can also have positive social impacts. Firstly, it can result in a healthier and safer working environment for construction workers due to, among others, avoiding hazardous and harmful components and limiting on-site preparation work when using prefabricated elements. Secondly, it can positively impact local communities by reducing on-site work intensity and shortening its duration[4].

The main principles of circular construction and renovation

  • Use existing building stock when possible.
  • Minimise energy and resource (material) consumption.
  • Extend the life of products through, for instance, proper maintenance, repairs, and renovations.
  • Design new products so that they are durable but also can be easily repaired and, eventually, reused.
  • Avoid multi-material items that are more difficult to recycle.
  • Avoid harmful substances.
  • Use as many materials and elements that can be reused as possible.
  • Improve processes and products continuously.

Circular building

To be able to talk about circular construction, it is necessary to develop a definition of a circular building, especially since there is no such definition in the current state of the law. It is why the following definition was created:

A circular building is a building that, throughout its life cycle, does not deplete the Earth’s non-renewable resources and does not degrade the ecosystem.

To achieve this, the building should:

  • be designed, operated, and dismantled following the above principle;
  • be made entirely of materials that were already in use;
  • be energy efficient in the construction and use phases, and be based on renewable energy that does not deplete the Earth’s non-renewable resources over its entire life cycle;
  • minimise waste generation during the construction and use phases;
  • allow for its flexible use and expansion;
  • allow its reuse in whole, in parts, or as individual materials.

Constructing a 100% circular building is very difficult and downright impossible with the current state of the construction sector. Nevertheless, the goals set out in the above definition, which should be pursued, should guide the actions taken throughout the building’s life cycle.

Design-for-adaptability and design-for-disassembly

are the pillars of circular construction.

Design-for-adaptability

Adaptability is the ability to easily modify a building or part of it throughout its life cycle, depending on changing needs and future circumstances, without requiring major construction work. It is necessary to accommodate changes in the type of use, demographics, and user needs or because of the need to adapt to external factors such as climate change. Over time, users’ needs may also change regarding their physical capacity limitations associated with advancing age. In the case of residential buildings, adaptability features can allow users to adjust their dwellings to meet their needs as they change with age.

The ISO 20887 standard provides an overview of design for disassembly and adaptability principles and strategies for integrating these into the design.

General design principles for adaptability are:

  • versatility (floor space having multiple uses throughout the day, week, or month without requiring changes to the building’s design, for instance, space with a width of doors and no thresholds enabling to manoeuvre a wheelchair);
  • convertibility (floor space designed so that it can be easily repurposed, e.g., an office building can be designed and built so that it is possible to convert it into a residential building in the future);
  • expandability (the ability to add additional floors or floor space without significant changes to the building structure).

Design-for-disassembly

En Brand Layers HouseThe design of the building should also take into account elements and components that can be easily disassembled and reused in the future. According to the ISO 20887 standard, the general principles of design-for-disassembly are:

  • ease of access to components and services (easily (with minimal damage) approachable material/elements/connectors, especially those with shorter anticipated lifetime, and exposed connections with room left on all sides to enable disassembly);
  • independence (ability to remove/upgrade elements/connectors/modules/systems without negatively affecting the connected and adjacent systems through designing a building in layers standing independently, for instance, following the Brand’s Theory of Layers[5]);
  • avoidance of unnecessary treatments and finishes, which might hinder future reuse or recycling;
  • supporting reuse (circular economy) business models by adapting circular solutions wherever possible;
  • simplicity (elements/connectors/modules/systems designed to be straightforward with the reduced number of subcomponents materials to the minimum required to execute the intended function);
  • standardisation (using elements/connectors/modules/systems with standardised dimensions, components, connection types, and modularised);
  • safety of disassembly.

Str35ang

New roles and responsibilities

in circular construction

The transition to a circular economy will require a new systemic and holistic approach to how buildings are designed, used, and maintained by everyone involved in the construction process. Circular activities can be implemented throughout building lifecycle stages:

  • Design stage: including sustainable and secondary materials in the design, design-for-disassembly, and design-for-adaptability;
  • Construction stage: reuse of construction components and equipment, responsible and sustainable construction waste management.
  • Operational stage: conscious maintenance and repair, optimisation of energy consumption.
  • Demolition stage: selective demolition, responsible and sustainable demolition waste management.

In this section, the new responsibilities of construction stakeholders are concisely shown.

Contractors

  • reducing consumption of materials/elements by optimising their delivery (thus avoiding over-ordering) and sourcing them from local suppliers (thus avoiding long-distance transport);
  • reducing consumption of materials/elements and waste generation (off-cuts) by cooperating with manufacturers supplying ready-for-assembly products to the desired size;
  • properly sorting construction waste;
  • actively cooperating with design teams to provide hands-on knowledge on circular solutions within the construction stage.

Demolition team

  • performing selective demolition, properly separating and segregating waste into reusable and recyclable.

Design teams

  • increasing the share of secondary and sustainable materials in the design;
  • including design-for-disassembly and design-for-adaptability aspects in the project;
  • cooperating with contractors and manufacturers to form multi-disciplinary teams working on the most efficient ways of including circular solutions in the design;
  • cooperating with the project owner/investor to spread knowledge on circular solutions and their positive environmental and social aspects.

Insurance ad financial companies

  • providing important support in managing risks to reconcile security requirements with sustainability.

Manufacturers

  • creating new, more durable, easier-to-repair products from secondary materials as much as possible.

Public authorities

  • creating regulations enhancing circular construction;
  • creating appropriate rules to include circular solutions relevant to public procurement.

Tenants/building users

  • properly maintaining the building and its elements.
Circularity in

multi-criteria certification

Having sustainability in mind, multi-criteria certifications are gaining more and more attention in the construction industry. These certification systems often include circular economy principles as part of the overall sustainability. This section presents circularity aspects included in the most popular certifications and the Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs), often promoted to be used within these certifications as they reliably characterise material/element environmental impact.

Frequently, as part of the environmental assessment in the certification systems, a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is performed. LCA looks at all stages of a building’s lifespan (i.e., product, construction, use and end-of-life stages and possibilities of reuse and recycling materials/elements after the building’s end-of-life).

The framework and methodology of performing LCA for buildings are presented in the EN 15978 standard (Sustainability of construction works – Assessment of environmental performance of buildings – Calculation method).

Thanks to LCA, it is possible to identify the materials and elements with the greatest environmental impact throughout the life cycle and optimise their selection to minimise it.

Type III Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs)

The documents providing transparent information on the environmental characteristics of manufactured construction materials and elements are crucial in circular construction. The Type III Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) is a good example of such a document. EPD is not a typical certificate but a testimony to the environmental impact of a product throughout its life cycle, i.e., from the sourcing of materials, through the production stage, transportation, assembly, and use, ending with disposal and recycling.

EPDs are prepared following relevant standards, i.e., ISO 14040/14044, ISO 14025, EN 15804, or ISO 21930, and are usually issued for five years from the date of preparation.

The practical use of EN 15804 for environmental declarations has shown that EPD issuing bodies in Europe interpret many areas in the standard differently, often within the selection of appropriate data, data quality and availability, methodological details and assumptions, use scenarios, handling of Module D (recycling), or exclusions of certain life cycle stages[[i]]. The ECO-Platform association was formed in response to these issues, bringing together EPD issuing bodies for European construction products and ensuring a unified interpretation of EN 15804 and its harmonised implementation into national practices.

Currently, valid EPDs vary in terms of their scope. Some contain information only on the product phase (A1-A3 according to the LCA method), while in the context of circularity, product information in phases C and D, related to the end of product life, is relevant.

BREEAM

In BREEAM, the most premium is given to the efficient use of materials throughout the life cycle. As part of this, measures to minimise the use of materials, increase the proportion of reused materials, and use materials with higher recycled content are evaluated.

The certification also evaluates the durability of materials found in exposed building components, intending to reduce the frequency of their replacement and thus reduce material consumption. Therefore, appropriate protective measures must be taken to prevent damage to internal and external building elements.

Additionally, the possibility of functional adaptation of the building is also taken into account through the use of solutions proposed in the criteria, such as systems that facilitate the replacement of major installations, modular construction, and the possibility of expanding the building vertically or horizontally.

DGNB

DGNB certification has introduced a bonus point system for circular measures within selected areas. Additional points can be earned for reusing building materials or using recycled materials, reducing waste, minimising material inputs, and increasing building shareability and intensity of its use. Bonuses can also be received for improving the environmental performance of heavily contaminated land and implementing systems that allow using greywater and rainwater. In addition, the certification assesses the consideration of building adaptation in the context of structural modifications during use, as well as the origin of materials certified with the appropriate certificates and responsible planning for the dismantling of the building at the end of its life, which should be taken into account already at the design stage, along with the selection of building materials.

DGNB certification can be considered one of the most advanced systems in the context of the implementation of circular economy objectives.

 

LEED

LEED certification also features assessment areas that fit the circular economy concept and a premium point system for implementing measures in this direction. One of the prerequisites to be met is preparing a waste management plan (including construction and demolition waste) to monitor waste reduction and increase recycling or reuse. In this regard, premium points can be earned for reducing the generation of construction waste to a maximum of 50 kg/m2  of building floor area and increasing the recovery of materials from construction waste to a minimum of 50% or 75%.

LEED certification also places a premium on reusing historic or abandoned buildings in case of renovating a minimum of 50% of their floor area. Additional points can also be earned for reusing building components.

Last but not least, the LEED system enhances using environmentally certified materials or those with information on their source, such as C2C or EPD Type III certification.

References

[1]https://www.swecogroup.com/urban-insight/circularity/circular-construction-an-opportunity-we-cant-waste/
[2]SWECO, Building the future with data from the circular economy – Tools for extracting “green gold”, 2022.
[3]UNEP, RESOURCE EFFICIENCY AND CLIMATE CHANGE Material Efficiency Strategies for a Low-Carbon Future, 2020
[4]Kayaçetin et al., Social Impact Assessment of Circular Construction: Case of Living Lab Ghent, Sustainability, 15, 2023
[5]Brand S., How Buildings Learn: What Happens after They’re Built, Penguin Books, 1995
[6]Piasecki M., Assessment of environmental properties of products as part of the evaluation of a designed building, Installation Market, 7-8, 2014 (in Polish)